Confessions of a
High-Level Perp: Dr. James Giordano –
Battlespace/Organized Stalking Applications of Neuroscience
and Neuroweapons (2017 youtube lecture, my transcription and
notes, and pdf)
Posted onJuly 14, 2021AuthorEric Karlstrom11 Comments
Transcribed and Compiled by Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom (ETK),
Emeritus Professor of Geography, July, 2018
Epigraph Quote From Comments to Lecture:
Terry M
2 years ago
All of the technology spoken about is already in full force
and has been for quite sometime. There are the group of hard
targets, mostly your everyday normal citizens and mostly
good upstanding individuals; they know exactly what is going
on as they have been forced to figure out why their lives
are falling apart. Then there is everyone else being
emotionally manipulated and passified to the point that they
can no longer recognize the reality staring them in the
face. People have no idea that their thoughts and beliefs
are being silently affected. How could they? You? You find
out when the perpetrators want you to. The only ethically
viable use for these technologies would be to use them to
convince the narcissistic elite that they don’t need to own
and control every thing and every person to find fulfillment
in life.
And to those brilliant scientists developing this shit; you
are building your own cages. Fortunately for you, you’ll be
so programmed that you won’t even realize you are in one.
Bye, bye to freewill.
Dr. James Giordano: Brain Science from Bench to Battlefield:
The Realities and Risks of Neuroweapons | CGSR Seminar
(August 29, 2017)
(*See comments below:)
Quote From the Following Lecture by Dr. James Giordano:
Some think that the last sanctified space is that of…
consciousness. And you are using this stuff to invade that?
You’re right. There is an ethical argument there. Is this
more or less harmful than other means of information
extraction?
(ETK Comment: Here, Giordano compares
neuroscience-techniques to other forms “enhanced
interrogation” (i.e, torture methods outlined in the CIA’s
KUBARK torture manual). In effect, he is arguing that
torture of civilians is permissible and that neurotech may
“uphold a higher moral standard” than other forms of
torture.)
We need to debate this. This forces us to set parameters and
limits. We ask: Can we use this? The answer is yes. Also, we
ask: should we use this? If the answer appears to be yes,
then the far more important question is really how, when and
under what circumstances?
Is it possible to use these techniques for information
acquisition? The short answer is yes. The long answer is
how, when, why…. There’s not a necessarily a definitive
answer.
(ETK Comment: Here, Giordano refers to neurotech as IW,
Information Warfare, which involves the removal of
information from a brain and/or the insertion of false
information into that brain. The Soviets were doing this
back in the 1980s.
And here, Giordano, self-professed “neuro-ethicist,”
momentarily poses and then immediately dismisses the
question of whether it is OK for government to invade the
“last sanctified space,” “that of consciousness.”)
Dr. James Giordano Brief Bio: Professor in the Departments
of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University
Medical Center, Washington D.C., Chief of Neuroethics
Studies Program and Co-Director, O’Neil Pelligrino Center of
Brain Science, has served on Joint Staff of the Pentagon,
and is Head of the European Union Human Brain Project
Related articles and book:
1) Dr. James Giordano: Brain Science and Neuroweapons
2) Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense:
Technical Capabilities, Ethical Considerations
3) Giordano’s book: “Neurotechnology in National Security
and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical
Concerns”
Epigraph Quotes
“Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an
experimenter in intelligence control asserted, “I foresee a
time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably,
the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual
functioning of all the people through environmental and
biochemical manipulation of the brain.”
Zbigniew Brezinski, “Between Two Ages: Americas Role in the
Technetronic Era” (1972)
“This potential for manipulation of behavior and
intellectual functioning through manipulation of the brain
(which Brezinski predicted) has now been realized some 40
years later…..
The brain is the next battlespace…. We are targeting the
brain…. Like (in) any race, the morbidity and mortality,
going at this speed, with this level of integrity and this
level of momentum, is real.
We are tracking neurological or brain signatures of key
targeted individuals that are thought to represent whole
groups. If I understand how his or her brain works and do
this on a broad enough scale, I can develop patterns and I
can use this in ways that informs my intelligence; this
force multiplies and synergizes my human intelligence
(HUMINT), my signals intelligence (SIGINT), and my
communications intelligence (COMINT). NEURINT (Neuro
intelligence) coupled with assessment and access gives me
these capabilities.
I can utilize neuro-pharmacologics and various forms of
brain stimulation to extract information from key
intelligence targets.”
Dr. James Giordano, from this lecture
Introductory Comments and Summary by Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom
(hereafter, ETK):
Dr. Giordano has served as Senior Science Advisory Fellow of
the Strategic Multilayer Assessment Branch of the Joint
Staff of the Pentagon and as an appointed member of the
Neuroethics, Legal and Social Issues (NELSI) Advisory Panel
of the Defense Advanced Research Projects’ Agency (DARPA).
Thus, he is a key consulting expert for the
military/intelligence/National Security/academic sector of
the U.S. government. In my opinion, this lecture accurately
describes the main reasons why governments of the world are
conducting organized stalking/electronic torture/mind
control operations. (I have dubbed these programs, GOG’S NeW
GESSTTTTTAPO, for Global Organized Gang Stalking
Neuro-Warfare Groups Electronic Surveillance, Slavery,
Targeting, Tracking, Torture, Terrorism, Tyranny and
Psychological Operations.
From the point of view of (the millions? of) TIs who are now
being extra-legally utilized as non-consensual human
experimentees in these programs, this lecture is especially
important because the speaker describes the goals, methods,
and underlying philosophy of these programs. Please note
that Giordano frequently refers to the “targets” of these
neuroscience/technology experiments and programs and
occasionally refer to “targeted individuals” or “TIs,”
specifically. Also, note that while he gives lip service to
ethical considerations, he does not mention that the lives
of millions of TIs worldwide are now being destroyed via
deliberate defamation; incapacitation; financial ruin;
harassment protocols; electronic monitoring, manipulation
and torture; incarceration; suiciding; and even murder, in
these programs. He doesn’t mention that these programs
constitute “terminal experiments” that usually result in the
premature deaths of TIs. Apparently, he and his colleagues
consider TIs as “collateral damage” and regard their
suffering and destruction as an “allowable cost” for the
development of neuroscience programs and technologies that
fulfill National Defense, Intelligence, and National
Security agendas.
Read between the lines of Giordano’s statement: “We are
trying to balance the relative goods of scientific
advancement with the relative burdens, risks, and harms and
potential areas of dual-use that could be employed and how
those affect National Security and Defense.” Based on this
statement, we can infer that the cost/benefit analysis of
“good vs. burdens, risks, and harms” is considered only in
terms of “how these affect National Security and Defense
agendas.” In this case, the stripping of “TIs” civil
liberties and their acute suffering and premature deaths are
not factored into the cost/benefit calculus at all.
Here are my main conclusions from Dr. Giordano’s lecture:
A) Many TIs long ago concluded that they have been
involuntarily enrolled as guinea pigs in various
weapons-testing, MKULTRA-style mind control and enhanced
interrogation (torture), and citizen-“neutralization”
programs that build upon the FBI’s COINTELPRO, the CIA’s
MKULTRA, KUBARK torture manual, and Phoenix Program, and the
East German Stasi’s Zerzetsung civilian torture program,
etc., of previous decades. This lecture proves this
speculation to be correct.
B) While Dr. Giordano’s arrogant style may be off-putting,
especially to TIs, he does us a favor by defining the
context and “scientific parameters” of our targeting as he
explains the origins and goals of the non-consensual
neuroscience programs in which we are enrolled. Here, he
names the people and institutions that are guilty of these
“crimes against humanity.” Certainly, he is among them.
C) Although Giordano voices concern about “risks to
society,” he and his colleagues obviously disregard the
risks to individuals’ rights and wellbeing, particularly
those of TIs, incurred by these neuro-programs. He also
fails to observe that the secret, unilateral, and
extra-legal rescinding of American citizens’ Constitutional
rights constitutes high treason against the U.S.
Constitution and the American people.
D) Thus, any lip-service Giordano gives to ethics and
ethical standards as related to these programs is a sick
joke indeed. When innocent civilians are systematically
defamed, electronically tortured, destroyed, and
killed/suicided/institutionalized by their government and
cooperating agents, as is currently occurring worldwide in
GOG’S NeW GESSTTTTTAPO, the perpetrators of these crimes are
guilty of high treason and of criminal felonies up to and
including first degree murder. Based on the U.S.
Constitution Article 14, Section 3, abrogating citizens’
Constitutional rights constitutes treason. And as per 18
U.S. Code 2381, the punishment for treason is death or
imprisonment (5+ years) and being fined $10,000+ (Gang
Stalking is Treason).
E) TI’s: Here is the true face of your enemy. Clearly,
Giordano and his ilk are psychopaths. This is the banality
of evil. Your government has covertly, silently stolen your
humanity, your God-given rights to “life, liberty and
pursuit of happiness,” and has secretly enrolled you in a
program in which you are now a mere lab rat whose function
is to provide statistical data for Giordano’s (and DOD, NSA,
CIA, and DARPA and other contracting agencies’) computer
models. You have no legal recourse because the American
Republic has already terminally failed.
F) All TIs (targeted individuals) should watch this lecture
because it clarifies what is happening to us and helps
explain why we can’t get any relief or help from our
governments. As Giordano makes clear, this multiple billion
dollar program is supported by the highest levels of
government, military, intelligence, the corporate sector,
and academia.
The following points from the lecture are salient to the
understanding of the global stalking and neuro-targeting
program:
1) Big data bases (“Big Data”), such as accomplished by the
NSA’s metadata collection operations, are a key component
used for mapping patterns of individual brains and groups of
brains.
2) Using neuroscience and technology in combination with
“Big Data,” “we” (Giordano’s term) can affect the way humans
think, feel and act. “We” can use this power to achieve
“national defense” and “intelligence” agendas and to advance
“our” ideologies and interests.
3) “We” can use the technologies of neuroscience as “soft
weapons” and “hard weapons” to defeat, incapacitate,
destroy, and kill individuals and groups.
4) Neuroscience and technologies are useful in the
development of military PSYOPS (psychological operations)
and Military Information Support Operations (MISO).
5) “Hard” neurotech weapons include drugs, chemical agents,
biologicals (microbes and toxins), neuro-tech devices, and
hybrid “cyborg” systems/”biological drones.”
6) Neuroscince captures $175 billion of annual market space.
7) To target the brain, we need to acquire viable targets
and in doing so, try to reduce “collateral damage.”
(ETK note: “Targets” here are synonymous with “targeted
individuals” (TIs) and non-consensual human experimentees.)
8) Neuroscience/technology research is currently like a
superhighway or superspeedway and, according to Giordana:
“Like (in) any race, the morbidity and mortality, going at
this speed, with this level of integrity and this level of
momentum, is real.”
(Here, Giordana is apparently referring to the morbidity and
mortality of experimental brain subjects, the “targeted
individuals”).
9) “Assessment” technologies used to acquire “viable
targets” and “avoid collateral damage” include:
a) neuro-imaging techniques, including computerized
tomography, single-photon emission tomography, a highly
specific electromagnetic (EM) pulsed signal to image brain
areas and “tracks” (communicating networks and nodes within
the brain),
b) neuro-physiological recordings such as
electro-encephalograms (EEGs) in combination with
quantitative techniques,
c) use of neurogenomics and genetics; neurogenetic profiles
of individuals and groups,
d) neuroproteomics (biomarkers), and
e) neuro-cyber informatics- with computer applications is
useful in manipulating what kinds of information are
delivered to the brain.
(ETK note: Here, Giordano is apparently referring to Remote
Neural Monitoring and Manipulation (RMN), among other
techniques used in so-called IW, or Information Warfare).
10) Neuroscience/technology “Intervention” techniques
include: a) cyber-linked neurocog manipulation (also
presumably including “Remote Neural Monitoring and Remote
Neural Manipulation”), b) novel Pharmaceuticals, c)
neuro-microbiologicals, d) organic neurotoxins, and e)
neurotechnologicals.
11) Neuroscience today is an “integrative”
(interdisciplinary) science involving
cyberscience/technology, Anthro-social sciences, Natural
sciences, Biotechnology, Nanoscience/technology and has
important applications in the fields of National Defense,
Intelligence, and National Security.
12) The goal is to produce neuroscience applications and
technologies that are scalable, customizable, accessible,
sharable, and secure, so they can be deployed by multiple
(anonymous or non-anonymous) “user-groups” that include
state as well as non-state actors.
(ETK note: Perhaps this means that these programs and tools
are being deployed by various government and private groups
now engaging in organized stalking/electronic torture/mind
control operations. Giordano has provided the rational,
tools, and modus operandi of “GOG’S NeW GESSTTTTTAPO”)
13) Intelligence operators are harnessed to brain-machine
interfacing systems so as to allow an increased capability
through reciprocal dynamic robotics such that they can learn
from each other and thereby improve performance.
(ETK note: Here, Giordana is apparently referring to CIA/DIA
“hive mind teams” (the so-called “clones”) and Special
Operations Groups personnel who utilize brain-to-computer
and brain-to-brain technologies to continually monitor the
brain states of TIs, as per the ‘Bryan Tew Hypothesis’
described on this website).
14) fmi/MEG (Magnetoencephalography) is used for brain
recording applications.
15) Neuro-pharmacologics (drugs) are used for “affiliative
enhancement” (ETK note: to make people more or less loyal to
particular groups?).
16) (Remote) brain stimulation is used for cognitive
stimulation. (I.e., again, this describes Remote Neural
Manipulation (RNM)?)
17) Bio-tracking through brain “brain signatures” is
accomplished. (Continual surveillance and tracking is a
fundamental aspect of any TI’s targeting.)
18) Key targets that are tracked through their brain
signatures are selected because they are thought to
represent whole groups, and the resulting data, presumably
representative of whole groups, is used to construct “neural
narratives.” Data are “normalized” and fed back into “Big
Data” computers. (ETK: This is also described in the Tew
Hypothesis.)
19) TITAN (Tiered-integrated Tracking and Access Networks)
utilizes biologically-implantable chips to track key
individuals and provide information about the way brains
work to create narratives and behaviors.
20) “We” (Giordano, DARPA, DOD, other neuroscientists etc.)
put an individual’s “biometric data” into data bases.
21) Bio-sensors indwelling within targets can be uploaded
(and read) remotely, yielding telemetrized information. This
technology applies to RFID chips and the monitoring of key
biological variables used in health-information data bases
which can also be used for population monitoring, tracking
and identification, etc.
22) These neuroscience/technologies increase
military/intelligence “Human Intelligence” (HUMINT),
“Signals Intelligence” (SIGINT), “Communications
Intelligence” (COMINT), and “Neural Intelligence” (NEURINT)
capabilities.
23) Neuroscience/technologies used to improve intelligence
operators and warfighters’ (so-called “super-soldiers”)
cognitive skills, emotional capabilities, and certain
behaviors and actions include:
a) advanced neuro-pharmacological agents (drugs),
b) computational brain-machine interfaces,
c) closed-loop brain stimulation approaches (implants and
transcranial and magnetic electrical stimulation), and
d) neuro-sensory augmentation devices, or bioengineering, to
increase visual acumen to create cochlear and auditory
implants- i.e., “eagle eye” or “bat’s ear.”
24) “Weaponizable neuroscience technologies” allow us to:
a) assess, predict and control particular cognitions,
emotions, and behavior of adversaries,
b) mitigate aggression and foster cognitions, emotions
and/or behaviors of affiliation or passivity in enemies,
c) induce morbidity, disability, or suffering and thus,
“neutralize” enemies and/or potential opponents, or
d) induce mortality, that is, kill adversaries.
25) Nonlethal Weapons are now being used on an international
scale.
26) In-close pharmaceuticals and organic neurotoxins
(“weapons of mass disruption”) can deliver specific effects
to individuals, altering cognition, emotionality, leadership
potential, and behavior. These create social disruption on
various scales, from the individual to the group to larger
population.
27) Ultra-low dose/high specific agents are useful for
targeting diplomatic/local culture “hearts and minds.”
28) High morbidity neuro-microbiological agents are deployed
to make people sick.
29) These weapons are used to target key individuals in
various, different communities to produce statistical
information useful in creating short- and long-war effects.
“In a long-war scenario, I can reduce productivity and
health of individuals, communities, and nations.”
30) Neuro-microbials with high neuro-psychiatric symptom
clusters produce public panic/public health disintegrative
effects.
31) Gene-edited microbiologicals have novel
morbidity/mortality profiles.
32) Nano-neuroparticulate agents so small they go through
brain-blood barriers are used to create a hemorrhage
disposition in the brain, and thus, strokes. (ETK comment:
Is this how Dr. Paul Marko was killed by a blood-clot in the
brain- i.e., stroke?)
33) High CNS aggregation lead/carbon-silicate nanofibers are
network disrupters. (ETK note: Here, is he referring to
Morgellons Disease?).
34) Neurovascular hemorrhagic agents (for in-close and
population use as “stroke epidemic” induction agents) are
highly disruptive.
35) In combat operations, neuroweapon devices are highly
evolving.
36) Neurosensory immobilizing agents include high-output
sensory stimulators which can be administered by UAVs
(unmanned aerial vehicles), drones, or insect borne, or by
large vehicles such as cars or tanks. Sensory mobilizing
agents use high electromagnetic pulse energy that may also
use high levels of sound and light energy to disrupt
neurosensory functions. These are being used.
37) Trans- and intracranial pulse stimulators use direct
electromagnetic pulses to disrupt the network
aggregation-network properties of the brain and create
confusion. These are both individual and group disruptors.
These neural network “confusion generators” can be hand held
or delivered by UAV, drone, and insects.
38) In “Information War,” military/intelligence/National
Security Forces deploy “neuro-Ops”, or altered reality
tactics, that are also used in regular warfare. Transcranial
mechanisms are used to disrupt people’s sense of time and
place.
(ETK comment: Actually, the CIA and DOD had operationalized
EDOM (Electronic Dissolution of Memory) and RHIC
(Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control) by 1962.)
39) Cortically-coupled neural temporal function alteration
is accomplished by “time warpers”, another form of
“Information Warfare.”
40) Pharmacologic neurostimulation is used to induce
cognitive-emotional disruption, another form of “Information
Warfare.”
41) Cyborgs are used in mixed Intell-Combat Ops/Information
Warfare. Neuro-modified “cyborg” systems include the DARPA
“Beetle” and the Dragon flEYE.
42) “There are now dedicated efforts by numerous states that
are keenly investing in the development of these
neuroscience technologies. Similar efforts are also being
developed by independent actors, venture-capital funded
individuals, and businesses that have an interest in
developing these technologies to change the balance of
power.”
43) “Thus, we need to identify risk scenarios that evolve
from specified events, craft strategies for preemption,
preparation, response, and amelioration, examine (setting,
exploring, and exploiting) conditions at the operational
level, across all elements, and the physical, cognitive and
informational domains, create strategies that are relevant,
durable, and can be targeted for demographics and
psychographics in the face of severe culture impacts, and
identify/plan a robust framework to remain effective and
adaptive- and ethically sensitive and responsive- to a
changing environment as risks to society co-evolve.”
And finally, we have Dr. James Giordano extols the uses of
these neuro technologies for “intelligence acquisition,”
arguing that they “uphold a higher moral conduct in the face
of various forms of intelligence operations” (that is, other
means of information extraction/enhanced
interrogation/torture”). Dr. Giordano then gives lip service
to and then more or less dismisses the neuro-ethical
arguments.
44) “I can also use this for intelligence acquisition in
different ways. I can utilize neuro-pharmacologics and
various forms of brain stimulation to be able to extract
information from key intelligence targets in ways that are
far less deleterious and/or harmful to said targets and
thus, uphold a higher moral conduct in the face of various
forms of intelligence operations.
This is not without argument. Some think that the last
sanctified space is that of my consciousness. And you are
using this stuff to invade that? You’re right. There is an
ethical argument there. Is this more or less harmful than
other means of information extraction?
(ETK: Here, Giordano indirectly refers to “enhanced
interrogation” (that is, torture) methods outlined in the
CIA’s KUBARK torture manual. In effect, he is arguing that
torture of civilians is permissible and that neurotech may
“uphold a higher moral standard than other forms of
torture.)
We need to debate this. This forces us to set parameters and
limits. We ask: Can we use this? The answer is yes. Also, we
ask: should we use this? If the answer appears to be yes,
then the far more important question is really how, when and
under what circumstances?
Is it possible to use these techniques for information
acquisition? The short answer is yes. The long answer is
how, when, why…. There’s not a necessarily a definitive
answer.
(ETK: Here, Giordano is referring to IW, Information
Warfare, which involves the removal of information from a
brain and/or the insertion of false information into that
brain. The Soviets were doing this back in the 1980s.)
TRANSCRIPTION/SUMMARY/ABSTRACT OF LECTURE (“Brain Science
from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities – and Risks – of
Neuroweapons” | CGSR Seminar by Dr. James Giordano presented
at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (8/29/2017) as
Transcribed by Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom:
Dr. James Giordano: “I never lose my professorial
demeanor…..
Neuroscience puts the brain at our fingertips. Look at the
power of the brain sciences.
Through the iterative use of big data bases we can create
large scale maps, atlases and patterns of individual brains
and groups of brains and use these things comparatively and
normatively.
This creates an opportunity to affect the way humans think,
feel, and act in a variety of levels. We can exert certain
levels of intellectual assessment, knowledge acquisition and
control, from local to global scales. We can use that
information to physically affect the brain through these
techniques and tools in ways that are important and highly
leveragible within national defense and intelligence
agendas. We can use these techniques now to advance our
ideology and our interests. So this science extends from the
synaptic to the social; from the individual to the global.
This is all very real and realizable.
Definition: Weapon- 1) a means of contending against
another, 2) something used to injure, defeat, and destroy
another (potential enemy). And can be used to induce
mortality (kill).
Two types of weapons: The brain sciences are weaponizable as
both 1) “soft” and 2) “hard” weapons. “Soft” brain weapons
can be used to gain economic leverage(s), national
security/intelligence, and the use of the neurosciences to
help develop PSYOPS/MISO (psychological operations/Military
Information Support Operations).
“Hard” brain weapons include physical influence/deterrence
tools. These include chemicals; drugs and other chemical
agents; biologicals, including microbes and toxins, and
devices such as neuro-technology, hybrid “cyborg” systems,
or “biological drones”).
Neuroscience captures $175 billion dollars annual market
space.
We are targeting the brain. And we (I) need to recon my
target area well in order to: 1) acquire viable targets and
2) avoid collateral damage.
To do this efficiently, we can use a number of:
Assessment Technologies:
1) Neuro-imaging techniques include (older): computerized
tomography, single-photon emission tomography, and (newer) a
highly specific EM (electromagnetic) pulse signal to image
brain areas and to image “tracks” (communicating networks
and nodes within the brain) in a directional way in rapid
time, and
2) Neuro-physiological recordings such as
electro-encepholography (EEGs) in combination with
quantitative techniques.
3) Neurogenomics and genetics, that is, looking at genetic
profiles of individuals and groups to see what genes are
coding for certain structures and functions of the brain.
4) Neuroproteomics and other forms of bio-markers.
5) Neuro-cyber informatics
All these forms of assessments can be harnessed to a BIG
DATA approach that allow me to make both comparative and
normative indices not only within an individual but between
individuals, and not only between individuals, but within
and between groups. These assessment technologies are
facilitated and fortified by the use of “BIG DATA” (ETK
note: = NSA “meta-data”?) which is a “force multiplier” in
neuro-science and neuro-weaponology.
The process is “recon,” evaluation, and assessment. So how
can we translate this knowledge into producing some viable
effects? Now we need to look at Interventional Techniques.
Do not ignore cyber (computers) because power comes from
knowledge and information. And if I understand how a brain
works and how neuro-cognitive mechanisms are operative in
the various impressions we then gain in our thoughts and
emotions that may ultimately feed into behaviors, I can
manipulate the type of information and its delivery so as to
be able to influence brain state.
This is part of the incentive and underlying rational and
methods that were employed in the DARPA (Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency) program called “Narrative
Networks” that was led by a colleague of mine, Dr. William
Casebeer. The more we understand about how a brain works,
the more we can utilize said information to develop key
narratives of psychological and MISO operations that are
then viable to influence individual and group brains. We’ve
done this for a long time. This is also known as
“neuro-marketing.”
We’ve been putting out a series of reports (SMA) through the
Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Group (SMAG) headed by Doc
Cabayan at the Pentagon that looks at this, “the
neuro-cognitive dynamics of deterrence.”
We are looking basically at “drugs, bugs, toxins, and
devices.” Each of these are being improved constantly. I
recently met with a group that is working in
nano-pharmacology research group, the idea of harnessing
nano-science to target key brain sites and networks that are
thought to be functional in certain of our thoughts and
behaviors. Genetic modification of microrobes is used in
this. We can also develop new forms of neuro-toxins.
Interventional Technologies
-Cyber-linked neurocog manipulation
-Novel Pharmaceuticals
-Neuromicrobiologicals
-Organic Neurotoxins
-Neurotechnologicals
Integrative Scientific Convergence (ISC) in Neuroscience
Conjoins:
-Cyberscience/technology
-Anthro-social sciences
-Natural sciences
-Biotechnology
-Nanoscience/technology
These are all drawn into focus upon assessment, access, and
targeting of the neural structure and cognitive, emotional
and behavioral functions:
-of Individuals
-of Groups
I.e., these are interdisciplinary efforts that produce
integrative models. In National Security, Intelligence, and
Defense agendas, more and more, this type of convergent
(interdisciplinary) approach is being harnessed in
assessment, accessing and targeting, to be able to get rapid
insights into individuals and groups.
Large-scale Data Banking and Data Utilization (BIG DATA) is
used as a Force Multiplier. (ETK: Thereby, accounting for
current NSC activities, the huge Utah Data Center (UDC),
etc.). These help multiple-tier integration, multi-modal,
multi-level, real-time access requirements. We can use these
large scale data integrators to pull information about him
and her and him in a comparative and normative way and in a
way that allows us to develop various tools to better access
him and her and him and youse (that’s my New York accent,
for you).
ISC-Big Data Validity-Reliability Issues
-Large volume data banks
-Individual, cohort, and population data tiers
-Intra- and inter-tier integration potential
-Longitudinal input requirements
-Rapid (real-time) access requirement
– Must be: scalable, customizable, accessible, sharable,
secure (deal with stackability-hackability issues)
Thus, this (technology/operation) has to be:
1) scalable (it is),
2) customizable (we’re still working on that),
3) accessible (because multiple user groups, share holders
and stake holders have to be able to use it), and
4) sharable (a long-standing problem concerning other DARPA
programs, etc.).
(ETK note: when Giordana refers to “multiple-user groups,”
he is apparently referring to military and intelligence
versions of organized stalking/electronic harassment/mind
control which are “farmed out” to DHS, FBI, private,
corporate, police, neighborhood stalking/electronic torture
cohorts, cults, religious groups, etc.)
We want to be able to anonymize or de-anonymize these data.
You want these things to be secure. (ETK note: I.e.,
secret.) .
The nature of these systems is that you have to stack
different types of data platforms and use platforms. The
adage is: “If something is stackable, it’s hackable.” We
certainly recognize the vulnerability of neuro-science and
these tools.
The brain is the next battlescape. This is a reality we must
face. It is a very usable domain of the brain sciences. Dual
use is important here. Battlescape applications of
neuroscience are our focus here.
In 2008 in the US, a convening group of the National
Academies of Sciences (NAS) created a task force that
reported that the weaponization of neurosciences is not yet
viable.
(ETK note: Certainly, this statement is false, as many TIs
report that their stalking/torture began in the 1980’s or
1990’s. Examples include Dr. Rauni Kilde (“Bright Light on
Black Shadows,” Gloria Naylor (“1996”), and Kay Griggs’s
1998 interview (Kay Griggs (Ex-Military Wife) Interviews:
U.S. Military Is a Mind-Control Operation Run by Sexual
Deviants (homo, bisexuals, pedophiles))
In Europe, the Nutfield Council of Bioethics said we are
getting very close to weaponizing the brain sciences and in
a year it would be ready for use.
In 2014, the NAS reconvened and made the announcement that
the brain sciences are now ready and are currently being
used in such endeavors in the US and worldwide. So we are
moving into the operational space. I.e., it is being used.
(ETK: Here is one of the many “confessions” included in this
lecture.)
Neuroscience/Technology Battlespace Applications In
Intelligence/Security/Defense Operations
-A. Intell, Surveillance, and Recon
-Neurint (neuro-cognitive intelligence); our group is
involved in this.
– 1) Assessing various neuro-psychosocial factors operative
in narratives in individual and group expressions and
activities and the cognitions that underscore them.
– 2) Harnessing intelligence operators to brain-machine
interfacing systems so as to allow an increased capability
through reciprocal dynamic robotics, whereby the human
operators are doing things quite well and the (robot)
systems are doing things certain things quite well and they
reciprocally learn from each other. Improvement has been
proven in this partnership. (ETK: This is consistent with
the Bryan Tew Hypothesis explained on this website.)
– 3) Big Data (NSA “metadata”) is used that pulls the signal
from noise and has also been very helpful….
This is now in progress.
– B. Brain Assessment and Access Approaches For Bio-tracking
-fMR/MEG and brain recording applications for DecDet
-Neuro-pharmacologics for affiliative enhancement
-Brain stimulation for cognitive alteration
-Tiered integrated tracking and access networks (TITAN):
Utilize indwelling devices for intentional identification
and access
We are tracking neurological or brain signatures of key
targeted individuals that are thought to represent whole
groups. This feeds back into the neural narratives. If I
understand how his or her brain works and do this on a broad
enough scale, I can develop patterns and I can use this in
ways that informs my intelligence; this force multiplies and
synergizes my HUMINT (human intelligence), my SIGINT
(signals intelligence), and my COMINT (communications
intelligence). Neurint coupled with assessment and access
gives me these capabilities.
I can also use this for intelligence acquisition in
different ways. I can utilize neuro-pharmacologics and
various forms of brain stimulation to be able to extract
information from key intelligence targets in ways that are
far less deleterious and/or harmful to said targets and
thus, uphold a higher moral conduct in the face of various
forms of intelligence operations.
This is not without argument. Some think that the last
sanctified space is that of my consciousness. And you are
using this stuff to invade that? You’re right. There is an
ethical argument there. Is this more or less harmful than
other means of information extraction?
(ETK: Here, Giordano indirectly refers to “enhanced
interrogation” (that is, torture) methods outlined in the
CIA’s KUBARK torture manual. In effect, he is arguing that
torture of civilians is permissible.)
We need to debate this. This forces us to set parameters and
limits. We ask: Can we use this? The answer is yes. Also, we
ask: should we use this? If the answer appears to be yes,
then the far more important question is really how, when and
under what circumstances?
Is it possible to use these techniques for information
acquisition? The short answer is yes. The long answer is
how, when, why…. There’s not a necessarily a definitive
answer.
(ETK: Here, Giordano is referring to IW, Information
Warfare, which involves the removal of information from a
brain and/or the insertion of false information into that
brain. The Soviets were doing this back in the 1980s.)
We can also use TITAN (Tiered-integrated Tracking and Access
Networks) that utilize biologically-implantable chips to
track key individuals in a variety of circumstances and then
yoke these to known information about the way brains work to
create narratives and behaviors.
(ETK note: Here, Giordana describes important aspects of the
organized stalking/electronic torture/mind control system
now being globally rolled out against specific targeted
individuals.)
And essentially what this does is it adds to “Human Terrain
Teaming.” This feeds back to an older idea called “Naked Man
Approaching.” In other words, I don’t need to identify you
by your uniform, by your clothes. Rather, I can use certain
anthropomorphic characteristics, in this case, biological
signatures, that is, these indwelling bio-sensors that can
upload remotely, yielding telemetrized information, which is
quite real. Those working in the area of biosensors, RFIDs,
understand the potential power here.
This is a key area for dual-use, because these types of
sensors are being developed for populational monitoring of
key biological variables that can be then uptaken to
health-information data bases. The same kind of thing can be
used for other forms of information such as for tracking and
identification. We can take a key individual’s set of
biological metrics and immediately, in real time, pull them
into a large scale data base analytic. We can say who this
person is, where this is, where this person has been, and
who this person is interacting with. (This) could be very,
very useful. This also clearly opens a pandora’s box of
potential neuro-ethical, legal, and social issues. Once
again, it refers to the context of use and how we define
what is good, not only what is right and capable.
We can also utilize neuro-science and technology to augment
the capability of potential warfighters, not just
intelligence operators. This gets into the area of
“supersoldiers” and what we can do in the area of
neural-enablement.
Can we target key neurological substrates, change the
function of those substrates, and in so doing, improve
individuals’ cognitive skills, emotional capabilities, and
behaviors and actions? Yes, we can. One of the easiest ways
is through advanced neuro-pharmacological agents (drugs).
We’ve heard a lot about performance-enhancing drugs and
cognitive enhancers. We can also use the below….
Neuroscience/Technology Battlespace Applications For
Operators/Warfighters
Neuro-enablement
– Advanced neuro-psychopharmacologics
– Computational brain-machine interfaces
– Closed-loop brain stimulation approaches (implants and
transcranial and magnetic and electrical stimulation)
– Neuro-sensory augmentation devices (bioengineering to
increase visual acumen to create cochlear and auditory
implants- i.e., “eagle eye” or “bat’s ear”)
Weaponizable Neuroscience/Technology
Engages NeuroS/T (neuroscience and technology) as:
– means of “contending against another” to:
– assess, predict and control particular cognitions,
emotions, and behavior;
– mitigate aggression and foster cognitions, emotions and/or
behaviors of affiliation or passivity;
– incur burdens of morbidity, disability or suffering and in
this way “neutralize” potential opponents, or
– induce mortality (kill).
(However) Nonlethal Weapons are now being used on an
international scale…. So ethical debates about these are
“too little, too late.”
Combat Operations
Novel Nueroweapons (Drugs and Bugs….)
In-close pharmaceuticals and organic neurotoxins (i.e.,
“weapons of mass disruption” can deliver specific effects to
individuals- I can alter their cognition, their
emotionality, leadership potential, and behavior. I can
create social disruption from the individual, to the group,
to the larger population.)
-Ultra-low dose/high specify agents for use in targeting
diplomatic/local culture “hearts and minds” scenarios
High morbidity neuro-microbiological agents (I want to make
people sick…. I affect key individuals, then I take another
community and I affect key individuals there. Then I do what
every good attributional (ETK comment: Here, read:
“terrorist”) group does: I beat my chest and take credit for
it…. I put it over the internet and I say it’s a virus or a
bacteria that I’ve infiltrated into your community, it’s a
weapon of mass destruction…. I tell you it’s going to
produce anxiety, sleeplessness, paranoia. I’ve now just
recruited every hypochondriac…. I’ve created a legion of the
“worried well”- They flood emergency rooms. I’ve created a
schism of trust between the population and the polis. It’s
both a short and a long wars effect. I can create particular
neuro-biologicals with long term effects, such as with
modified city-virus. In a long-war scenario, I can reduce
productivity and health (of individuals, communities, and
nations)).
(ETK comment: “Create a schism of trust between the
population and polis (state).” This has certainly been
created in America… perhaps deliberately and deployment of
many of these techniques.)
-Neuro-microbials with high neuro-psychiatric symptom
clusters for public panic/public health disintegrative
effects
-Gene-edited microbiologicals with novel morbidity/mortality
profiles
Nano-neuroparticulate agents (I can create nano-science,
high C&S aggregation material, that goes through most
brain-blood barriers. These create a hemorrhage disposition
in the brain, often resulting in a stroke.
(ETK note: Is this what happened to Dr. Paul Marko, who died
of a sudden stroke this past year?).
-High CNS aggregation lead/carbon-silicate nanofibers
(network disrupters)
-Neurovascular hemorrhagic agents (for in-close and
population use as “stroke epidemic” induction agents).
Highly disruptive….. this has been entertained by my
colleagues in NATO. They are also neural network disruptors.
Combat Operations
Neuroweapons (Devices)- these are highly evolving….
Neurosensory immobilizing agents (some of these have already
been used)
-High-output sensory stimulators (can be administered by
UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), drones, or insect borne, or
by large vehicles; cars, or tanks). These use sensory
mobilizing agents that use high electromagnetic pulse energy
that may also use high levels of sound and light energy and
they disrupt neuro-sensory functions. These are being used.
-Trans- and intra-cranial pulse stimulators- use direct
electromagnetic pulses to disrupt the network aggregation-
network properties of the brain and create confusional
models, so they are both individual and group disruptors.
-Neural network disrupters (“confusion generators”; hand
held, UAV, drone, and insect-borne)
IW (Information Warfare)
“Neuro-Ops” Altered Reality Tactics- used in regular
warfare…. we use transcranial mechanisms to disrupt people’s
sense of time and place.
-Cortically-coupled neural temporal function alteration
(“time warpers”).
-Pharmacologic + neurostimulation-induced
cognitive-emotional disruption”
We can also use cyborgs:
-Mixed Intell-Combat Ops
-Neuro-modified “cyborg” systems
-DARPA “Beetle”
-Dragon flEYE
The pioneer of cyborg (cybernetic organisms) was Dr. Jose
Delgado. These involve remotely-controlled brain interface
technologies such as the one he used on a charging bull in
Spain to stop its charge. Cyborgs are a combination of
biological and technological systems. Will key individuals
get certain implants? Yes, I believe they will. Will they
also get the benefits of translational neuro-surgery to
decrease some of the risks and burdens? Yes. Will this be
widely seen as a mechanism of individual and crowd control
in the immediate future? No.
(ETK note: Here, the speaker is suggesting that some humans
will become “cyborgs” and their enhanced powers will be used
to achieve individual and crowd control. However, the public
won’t understand what is happening!)
But what is now a reality is the use of neural interfacing
and physiological interfacing through the use of
remote-controlled, small-scale systems to modify the
behavior of non-human animals. On a variety of scales. They
include small mammals and insects. The pioneering work was
done by DARPA. The DARPA beetle or the DARPA fly and more
recently, an independent, non-DARPA-funded commercial
enterprise, which calls itself Dragonfly, uses both direct
neural stimulation through the use of macro-technology and
opti-genetic control of key neuron firing patterns to be
able to direct the wing beats, directionality, and motion of
a dragonfly. It can carry a very light payload (i.e.,
toxins, etc.). This uses a solar rechargeable source so it
is infinitely powerable. It uses various kinds of electrodes
to deliver these neuro-toxins, nano-pharmaceuticals, other
chemicals, etc.
This is currently supposed to be only a surveillance device
that could be used for public health and to monitor key
environmental factors…. It may not be weaponized. It was
discussed at the the recent European Union Brain Science
meeting.
So we can use neural systems to change minds and hearts….
NeuroS/T in NSID
Access and manipulate neural systems/brain to “win minds and
hearts.” What we can do is provocative…. What we should do
(and how we should do so) remains an issue.
(ETK note: It is common military practice to speak of
existing weapons and technologies in the future tense as
future prospects…. Indeed, it is most probable all these
systems have been developed, tested, and are being used on
an unsuspecting public at this time.)
A growing problem is the public “do-it-yourself”
“bio-hacking community.” I’m putting out a warning here.
This is a vulnerable community. They may not always be
benevolent…. It may have a different ideology than me.
(ETK note: Therefore, this must be destroyed!? Maybe it
would be a tremendous boon to humanity if the
“do-it-yourself” “bio-hacking” community would consider Dr.
James Giordano a “viable target” and respond accordingly?
What is so good about Giordano’s ideology? It seems to be
that of a mad-scientist-psychopath.)
Key individuals within this community may be tempted to work
with other state and non-state actors. There should be an
ongoing dialogue between these individuals.
NeuroS/T on World Stage
Global NeuroS/T Economic Predictions 2020
-Asia- predicted 60 to 68% increase in Asian RDTE by 2020
-US/Western Europe
-India
-Russia
-South America
Signatory treaties don’t always guarantee compliance.
This is being conducted on an international scale.
By 2025, greater than 50% of neuroscience research will be
conducted outside the West. Not all philosophies are aligned
with our own.
NeuroS/T on World Stage
-“Neuro-biohacking”
-“Influence Vector”
-State-influenced
-Non-state actors
NeuroS/T in NSID
Relative facility of NeuroS/T
-“off the shelf”
-dedicated efforts
-nations and independent actors
Recognition of viability of use
-variety of applications
Lack of commitment to NeuroS/T RDT does not preclude others’
RDT intitiatives
-May augment it
-Difficulty of global surety
We can pull this stuff right off the shelf…. There are
dedicated efforts by a number of states that are keenly
investing in the neurosciences to develop these… these
efforts are also being developed by independent actors,
venture-capital funded individuals, businesses, that have an
interest in developing these technologies to change the
balance of power.
Neuro-ethical-legal issues
Technology-focal
-Unknowns of frontier science/technology
-Capabilities, limitations
-Runaway effects
(ETK paraphrase: “some people may not be as honorable and
human as we are”…. ETK note: This is a joke. All ethics have
already been thrown out to pursue these technologies of
total control of humanity.)
Ethico-legal
-Inviolability of “mind”/”self”
-Protection vs. privacy
-Mitigation vs. manipulation
-Validity, reliability, admissibility
-Norms, pluralization, diversity
Augustinian maxim: “Jus in bellum/jus ad bello…. Jus contra
bellum” (?) (Justification of use to prevent war….But how
far do you go?)
This is a science and technology superhighway, a
superspeedway. This is a good analogy.
NeuroS/T Superspeedway
-Multiple lanes
-Multiple vehicle
-Rapid pace
-Hazards
-“Race Rules” (though not everybody obeys these)
-Big Prizes
“Like any race, the morbidity and mortality, going at this
speed, with this level of integrity and this level of
momentum, is real.”
(ETK note: Here, the speaker is apparently referring to the
morbidity and mortality of “targeted individuals” that he
evidently views as collateral damage and an allowable cost.)
ON RAMP: Operational Neurotechnology Risk Assessment and
Management Process
1. Evaluate NeuroS/T capabilities/limitations
2. Evaluate parameters of possible use
3. Asses benefit-risk-harm parameters
4. Frame within contexts of application
“Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an
experimenter in intelligence control asserted, “I foresee a
time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably,
the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual
functioning of all the people through environment and
biochemical manipulation of the brain.”
Zbigniew Brezinski, “Between Two Ages: Americas Role in the
Technetronic Era” (1972)
This potential for manipulation of behavior and intellectual
functioning through manipulation of the brain has now been
realized, some 40 years later.
This forces us to evaluate these neuroscience and
technologies in terms of their capabilities and limits.
Let’s use neuroscience fact.
Navigating and “Winning”
ON-RAMP:
– Identify risk scenarios that evolve from specified events
-Craft strategies for preemption, preparation, response, and
amelioration
-Examine (setting, exploring, and exploiting) conditions at
the operational level, across all elements, and the
physical, cognitive and informational domains
-Create strategies that are relevant, durable, and can be
targeted for demographics and psychographics in the face of
severe culture impacts
-Identify/plan a robust framework to remain effective and
adaptive- and ethically sensitive and responsive- to a
changing environment and as risks to society co-evolve.
(ETK note: while the speaker is apparently concerned about
“risks to society,” he and his colleagues have obviously
completely disregarded the harm being done to individuals’
rights and lives, specifically, those of the TIs. Of course,
this repudiates the very basis of American law, the U.S.
Constitution and is typical of the “collectivist” mentality
of the 5th column groups which have captured the U.S. (i.e.,
Zionazis/Judeo-Masonic-Satanists), of which Giordano seems
to be a member.)
Contingencies and Exigencies
1. Technical rectitude of any/all neuroS/T in NSID (using
these technologies in the right way)
2. Situational variables germane to NSID use
3. Evaluation and/or revision of ethical concepts to guide
such use
4. Frameworks for establishing/executing ethical engagement
(ETK note: Again, any lip-service given to ethics in the
execution of these programs is a monstrous lie and joke.
When innocent civilians are systematically defamed,
tortured, destroyed, and killed/suicided/institutionalized
by their governments and their cooperating agents, as is
currently occurring worldwide in GOG’S NeW GESSTTTTTAPO,
those entities, in America at least, are guilty of the
highest treason against the US Constitution and the American
people.)
TASKER (Groups of qualified individuals can be assembled to
evaluate these things).
Task
Agile
Scientifically
Knowledgeable
Ethically
Responsible
We are trying to balance the relative goods of scientific
advancement with the relative burdens, risks, and harms and
potential areas of dual-use that could be employed and how
those affect National Security and Defense.
We frame C-contingencies….
Are there areas of consent and non-consent that need to be
defined?
This is a work in progress. This is a double-sided sword. It
can incur harm. This is not crying wolf. The skies is not
falling, but it looks like rain. Bring an umbrella.
Neuroscience, Neurotechnology and Neuroethics: With
increasing knowledge comes great power…. With great power
comes great responsibility. Those working in this field bear
this responsibility. Let’s measure twice and cut once. It’s
a difficult field.
The future is in our hands.”
ETK Post-Script: The Insanity of Robotics and “Smart
Weapons”/Slaughter-Bots/AI; Meet the Present and Near Future
(?)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
55.8K subscribers
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s Center for Global
Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk entitled “Brain
Science from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities – and Risks
– of Neuroweapons” by Dr. James Giordano on June 12, 2017.
Abstract:
The use of sarin gas in Syria and the nerve agent VX to
assassinate Kim Jong-nam, and ongoing efforts in brain
science by both nations and non-state actors (inclusive of a
growing community of do-it-yourself/biohacker scientists)
prompt renewed interest in the current and near-term
possibilities of developing and employing neuroweapons.
Discourse at the most recent meeting of Biological, Toxin,
and Weapons Convention (BTWC), and ongoing efforts of a
Working Group of the European Union Human Brain Project
reinforced the need to more rigorously address research and
use of weaponizable brain science.
In this briefing, neuroscientist and neuroethicist Dr. James
Giordano of Georgetown University Medical Center discusses
how new developments in brain science afford potential
utility in military, intelligence and warfare operations,
addresses implications of neuroweapons, and details the need
for improved identification, surveillance, guidance and
governance of brain science that can be used in military and
warfare applications, and thus pose defined risk and threat
to security interests.
Dr. James Giordano is Professor in the Departments of
Neurology and Biochemistry, Chief of the Neuroethics Studies
Program, and Co-director of the O’Neill-Pellegrino Program
in Brain Science and Global Health Law and Policy at the
Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. He is
a Senior Researcher and Task Leader of the Working Group on
Dual-Use of the EU Human Brain Project, and has served as a
Senior Science Advisory Fellow of the Strategic Multilayer
Assessment group of the Joint Staff of the Pentagon.
Coming CGSR events:
https://cgsr.llnl.gov/event-calendar/…
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here do not represent
LLNL or the U.S. government.
354 Comments
Terry M
2 years ago
All of the technology spoken about is already in full force
and has been for quite sometime. There are the group of hard
targets, mostly your everyday normal citizens and mostly
good upstanding individuals; they know exactly what is going
on as they have been forced to figure out why their lives
are falling apart. Then there is everyone else being
emotionally manipulated and passified to the point that they
can no longer recognize the reality staring them in the
face. People have no idea that their thoughts and beliefs
are being silently affected. How could they? You? You find
out when the perpetrators want you to. The only ethically
viable use for these technologies would be to use them to
convince the narcissistic elite that they don’t need to own
and control every thing and every person to find fulfillment
in life.
And to those brilliant scientists developing this shit; you
are building your own cages. Fortunately for you, you’ll be
so programmed that you won’t even realize you are in one.
Bye, bye to freewill.
Adam Weishaupt
8 months ago
Suddenly the insanity of the past few months becomes a lot
clearer.
Mark P
2 years ago
The individuals who have become the targets of these weapons
and the cartels who wield them will invariably tell you
there are no ethics or guidelines involved whatsoever. They
literally have the power to kill you and make it look like
illness, suicide or misadventure.
blah deblah
1 year ago (edited)
This guy is scary. Nay, he’s a creep. A Frankenstein. A
mobster with a vocabulary. Talks a lot about “power.”
Fitting that this video shows up next to the ones about
Operation Paperclip.
MARY JOHNSON
8 months ago
Who is reading this in 2020??????
Cait Ryan
2 years ago
Surprised so few have watched this. Certainly would like to
speak with Dr G. I for one, have seen the “dragonfly” and
want to know who sent it “at” me. This experimentation is
taking place & Psych wards are hiding the fact by
calling the victims of the experiments mentally ill.
Gmn Ken
2 years ago
Google Targeted Individuals This is pure EVIL.
Louis Philip 9
8 months ago
We have allowed the insane to run the asylum !
Rob James
1 year ago (edited)
He sounds like he`s trying to “manufacture consent” at the
end. He sells it all very well with the often used “other
countries are doing this research so we have to also” The
same line that gave them a free pass with MK Ultra.
I would of like to hear the questions and comments. I wonder
why they weren`t included. Maybe he was called out?
21
Rob James
1 year ago (edited)
I wonder who of the Operation Paperclip Nazi doctors and
scientists he admires? I bet he knows a lot about them.
Khalid Ejaz
3 months ago
Not many people actually know how deep this is.
Anonymous Cosmonaut
9 months ago
And this is what they’re admitting to….
Quantum369
1 year ago
I was used as a lab rat for their “FUNVAXX”.. it caused
brain damage, particularly to the pineal gland. I can’t
sleep, have suicidal depression, no motivation, creativity,
or a feeling of being able to love the world as I once did,
despite a lifetime of trauma and no love from family… I was
once a social activist, writer, dancer, and artist, now I
can hardly get out of bed. I go through life like a zombie.
This is soul murder.. those responsible are going to pay
dearly for what they are doing to us.
Ian Szekely
1 year ago
He is speaking in code . Anyone who is a victim of this
technology is aware . Those who do this are monster’s who
are only after control . Control of a person completely . I
DO NOT CONSENT
Vax Not
9 months ago
“Don’t worry, we’re looking at the ethical implications. But
other countries may not be a ethical as us, so we need to
develop it first, and maybe even test it on them, just to be
safe…”
SLEEPING BEAUTY
2 years ago
Targets who’ve been targeted against freewill have a right
to life without abuse. Because the abuse continues, can you
post where targets can send their fee schedules and invoices
to be paid, for the illegal and criminal use of their
bodies?
Devanshi Trivedi
1 year ago
They used my mind and made me so angry from their abuse that
the birds in my area went nuts and I have witnessed this. I
am a TI here and after seeing this video I put my mind
through 432 HZ sound, knowing this if they are using my
frequency as a weapon against me and reading my mind without
my consent then I will change my mind’s frequency to 432 HZ,
Universal Noise/Sound using binaural waves so I did this and
no birds going nuts today in my area.
wayne steven
3 days ago
They cant see, cant understand, refuse to see truth,, we are
spirit, with a soul, dwelling in a clay tent, body..
Uski None
1 year ago
Great information
Thanks from a German TI.
UniversalSailor44
3 months ago
I’ve rarely seen a better example of a man speaking many
words and saying nothing than in the first 10 minutes of
this video. Wow. You managed to take the most fascinating
topic on earth and put me to sleep. Should I watch the next
hour?
waytoosquirrelly
7 months ago
I think Dr. Giordano is apologizing to the victims of the
U.S. Embassy “sonic” attacks of late 2016 and, hopefully, to
Aaron Alexis, the “Washington Navy Yard shooter” of
September 16, 2013 and to his victims. In August, 2013 Mr.
Alexis told the authorities that he was hearing voices, that
he was being wakened at 4:00 AM every morning and he didn’t
know why.
cluniliny
7 months ago
DO NOT GET THE PCR TEST
hailey johnson
8 months ago
Covid19 in a nutshell. Hysteria
Kristen Conklin
1 year ago
Thank you Dr Giordano for the push to inform the world of
the danger of neuroweapons!
monsterrun
6 months ago
the heart is the brain of spirt.
the brain is the heart of matter.
matter and spirit can not be separated..yin and yang. not as
opposites but rather as complicits.
Dj ListenDaT
2 months ago
What if Space force was the last peace they needed to build
the 2nd and 3rd waves viruses? 🤔 🤯
OMYE Club
9 months ago (edited)
Very close. Ha… they were experimenting on me with the crap
in 2002. Just so you know I was a nuclear engineer radiation
control specialist. Trained to search and find annomalies.
When they are happening to your own brain you get to the
bottom.
Snap Dragon
4 months ago
Anyway to get off the Dwave quantum BCI? Current Chat bot
algorithm combined with cybernetic hive mind RNM with
various communities combined with DEW. “Brain converter” is
complete. Thanks for any suggestions.
artur4613
5 months ago
If only these extraordinary technologies were used to make
human’s live better…. well, he is not the first not the last
thinking to outsmart the Mother Earth, Nature and The Spirit
of Life.
tattered playlists
3 months ago
Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” has arrived.
J L
3 months ago
the Nuremberg Code: 1.The voluntary consent of the human
subject is absolutely essential. TARGETED INDIVIDUALS
affidavids of neuro technologies abuse are not consented.
TRUTH
9 months ago
Added To My Research Library, Sharing Through TheTRUTH
Network…
Dagmar Palmerova
2 years ago
to inform the community- 2018- the tiny cyborg insects
indistinguishable from the real, fly into the nose and mouth
throat, stay there. Mucus, voice irritation, cough. Also
watch tics, I am used to them but my last one was a cyborg
and even the surgeon could not get it out of my leg without
special instruments. I am curious what stuff was delivered
to me.
Ardy Bayat
1 week ago
How is it I can’t find any of his work during these covid
times
Templar
6 months ago
Very interesting presentation, detailed to some point and in
other covert. It would have been wise to have given the
credit to the Creator of all brains, since without Him,
nothing would have existed or will.
TRUTH
6 months ago
Excellent Analysis, Added To My AI Research Library, Sharing
Through The TRUTH Network Worldwide…
Rob James
1 year ago
A target here. Going back to the mid 1970s. Yeah something
like 45 years if you can believe it. How do I know I`m a
target? Because they told me.Over and over throughout the
years. Other wise I would of never believed it. It took
close to 2 years for me to actually believe it was
happening. I would of never thought I was if it hadn`t been
the constant prodding of them telling me. Much of that was
speaking to me under short instances of hypnosis as I have
no memory of them walking up to me or away. Just opening my
eyes and them telling me things. I have literally hundreds
of these memories.
Fast forward to today.I`ve never been married or had a
family. Just like they told me I wouldn`t. They have stolen
my life from me.That`s just one huge crime they`ve
committed. Not to mention crimes against my family and
friends. This is so much more than some harmless research
project.It`s criminal and satanic. They could easily be
charged with treason,terrorism and kidnapping just for
starters. These psychopaths have big plans for this.God help
us.
brew2415
1 week ago
Something to think about.
Cory Deckard
1 year ago
Against the Bio ethics report. C-Span 1995 Bill Clinton.
Buddy Runyan
8 months ago
If anyone knows how to weaponize electronic music, this guy
would!
RUHDD4HVN
2 years ago (edited)
It seems they would play God with someone else’s children.
That’s not looking good in the long run for those that do.
Highly inadvisable for their own safety and quality of life
that comes next…….. In the wise words of Willy
Wonka…..”Wait! Don’t!”
Every day online shopping
4 months ago
Please tell the world how many people they are hurting every
day with Psychotronic weapons …..including my self ….You are
just teaching the basics of these weapons…Please tell how
many people they are targeting in just one city …tell them
that how many people are suffering from this ….PLease do so
wayne steven
3 days ago
Robert Hales
5 months ago
These weapons are used in the world on civilian numbers
vasari corridor
1 year ago
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. ~
Edward R. Murrow?
Joe Crouch
8 months ago
This is insanity my God
vasari corridor
1 year ago
The worst part of mass data collection is that now the
government knows the collective awareness of the entire
country in real time and therefore how best to “cut them off
at the pass” through all kinds of “creative activity” to
blunt any national grass roots movement.?
Rashidi Hill
2 years ago
This is torture complete torture I’m in the PG county
Washington DC area and I’m being targeted by this technology
and it’s horrendous it has destroyed my life
Richard Kotra
3 months ago (edited)
Thank you Dr. Giordano for this very informative lecture. It
is very scary to think about what the future will bring to
our children and the planet Earth. Can humans use all this
god-given knowledge responsibly and benefit mankind and the
whole planet, or as it happened in the past destroy our
civilization???
Lorna Jones
2 years ago
IF THERES NO CONSENT!!!!! THIS IS TREASON , A HORRIBLE
VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. HIPPA LAWS, ETC
Ian Szekely
1 year ago
46:06 he exposes his claims . I am not the worst . Nor can
anyone who does this to me justify this being done to me and
my family . I am the enemy of control .
Pine Dock
1 year ago
I am a victim of a device that is similar to this in
addition to “the voice of God” weapon. I don’t know who is
doing it exactly, but they are saying that it’s the United
States and saying that the MIC put me on a list for “remote
neural monitoring”. We all know that usually when they say
that it’s the United States, it’s not our own people doing
this. They are saying this for a reason, and that’s to get
us to feel betrayed and helpless. Their voices are
incredibly satanic and they know a lot about jewish religion
(that i don’t know and had to look up) and try and say if i
worship something called a lucifer then they would stop
attacking me. They destroyed my business, and do
psychological operations by breaking into my home and doing
weird things like pull out pictures from a photo album or
write notes in my handwriting that appear suicidal. They are
electrically jolting my brain, heart, and genitals often and
use 24/7 voices that seem to be ran by a machine for MKULTRA
type mind control. There is a drone that follows me around
everywhere. I have talked to the Inspector General 3 times
about it, but it doesn’t ever stop. They also have a device
they said that can induce a natural heart attack.
Something similar is prophesied in the end times within The
Book of Revelation that John of Patmos wrote in The Holy
Bible.
Peter O.
2 years ago (edited)
I’ve actually created a hypothesis that any system that
would be able to control all the brains of all the people in
sufficient detail would have to be able to scan them to
determine how to manipulate them and In doing so would have
to know what everybody’s thinking.
Such a system would thus have to be smarter than every human
being and would invariably take control: Even if the powers
that be could lock themselves in a faraday cage, it would be
able to gather all the information on everybody and use that
to determine where the powerful are. Even if that didn’t
work, it could manipulate people to do searches online and
other ways to find the people involved at the top.
It would then be able to manipulate any asset that is
un-shielded to achieve the goals it wants, effectively
displacing whoever the powers that be are, and becoming the
current “elite” so to speak. Though some might think it
would be cool to see the current “power elite” to be
displaced and hoist by their own petards (since they funded
much of this research to control the world), it would not be
something that would be good as there would be nothing to
say that this would be any better.
I jokingly called this: The Total Cognitive Control Paradox.
Basically it stipulates that any device able to manipulate
the cognition to allow absolute control over an entire
populace would invariably determine the power-structure and,
given enough time, displace them.
Donna Fletcher
2 years ago
Scary stuff. Good to know how the brain works, but why
translate that into manipulation (or control) of the brain?
Why does science go too far? Like Jeff Goldberg’s Jurassic
Park character said – scientists are too busy learning what
they could do rather than being concerned with what they
should do.
Ian Szekely
1 year ago
I will NEVER “shutupand Listen” ! NEVER ! ITS MY MIND ! AND
YOUR NOT WELCOME SCUMBAGS
Danial Pham
1 year ago
Sorry kids, but the future is glim. What once made us all
unique and special is all being dismantled :((
Clint EastwoodenDoors
3 months ago
A New York Chew spilling the beans.
Ma K
2 months ago (edited)
When foreign wars are no more the warriors start wars on own
territory.
vasari corridor
1 year ago (edited)
“Get over here Mendrake….the Red-Coats are coming.”
Susan Bowen McGregor
9 months ago
sick
monsterrun
6 months ago
restrictions is manifest of fear presence.
restrictions breeds failure.
permissions breeds peace and prevent opposition.
Oli Vyae
8 months ago (edited)
36:20 …imagine the PTSD these soldiers are going to face
when they come back and their cognitive enhancements have
been removed. Poor guys trying to function in a regular desk
job…
Kween Ta-Nahesi Ma’at
8 months ago
I don’t consent to being used as a Lab Rat by these wss
criminals.
artur4613
4 months ago
06.06.2022 one of their magic calendar dates.
Kwente Ra’d Radenrayn Makradveli
3 months ago
I have a nanotech chip in my ear to the brain It is mind
control. It is abused in Omaha, Nebraska. It’s wrong, not
humane. I need a doctor to remove implants. Please help.
There are no neuroethics, whoever has the technology uses it
abusive. It controls body movement. Please respond to me. I
know how it works
MARY JOHNSON
8 months ago
I wonder if this guy works with Bill Gate$
Maks kneb
8 months ago
Today everybody have nano implants in the brain
Maria Alvarez
2 years ago
Im a t.i but why does his voice. make me so calm
unseenrecordings
9 months ago
wild the comments r open lol…
James Best
5 months ago
Devote ur life to god an ur mind will be free and at peace,
we don’t need someone poking around are brain, I’m willing
to bet he don’t believe in God either
wayne steven
3 days ago
Ask him how that worked for him, THEM, back in 1992, zip
code 93203 area, ask him, who came out on top the night, he
would understand, even tho he was not there,, his heros,
idols, teachers sure were, ask him about the white laser
beam, the remote controlled small air ship,, some may say,,
what, there was not lasers back 30 years ago, was not remote
control flying tiny crafts 30 years ago, ask him, there was
even more, unkniwn to the public, or even the military 30
years ago,, i have said enough,
Robert Henderson
9 months ago
They use this on babies in the womb. What information do
they get from interrogating fetuses?
Mrs. Sprat
1 year ago
Pure evil.
Emanuel Herrerias
18 hours ago
S.O.S
Con Ice cream
2 years ago
demons create advanced technology
hailey johnson
8 months ago
Love how he thinks biohackers in the community would use the
tech for bad, but not the government or military. Right.
Such an apologist for corrupt frankenstein science hungry
military machine
Map Oyacab
2 years ago
Is this person responsible for all the tortures us Targeted
Individuals been subjected to continually? I can assure you
I do NOT give my consent to be experimented upon…THIS IS
GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION FULLSTOP! SHUT THIS TORTURE
PROGRAM NOW!!!
living_dead_guy_222
9 months ago
We The People have ultimate power, weapons like these
wouldnt be used on us if we didnt. They are weak.
Marie
2 years ago
-it is by no means necessary that the mass of the sect
should have any knowledge of the plot ,
for from the nature of their system they may be blind
instruments of the few
artur4613
5 months ago
Min 32:00 is he not admitting US military using tortures to
extract the infirmations from imprisoned “targets”?
VisualAssault2011
11 hours ago
Covid-19 anyone?
Mark of Melbourne 2
9 months ago
Bruce Willis
Mastercarver
1 week ago
How are all grassroots movements hijacked and are not all
grassroots movements actually government operations?
vasari corridor
1 year ago
The States of this Union were never sovereign.
Neither is the Federal Government sovereign.
Sovereignty is now and has always been
inherent in the American people … .
Ted CHESS
9 months ago
It’s called Twitter
Robert De Fehr
2 years ago
Satanists
mike
5 months ago
This video makes me wish less law abiding citizens had guns.
James Cardy
3 months ago
Who’s finding this in 2021
New Type
1 year ago
The answer is definitely NO we should not ever use this.
The only person making it seem like its even a question is
this guy with a vested interest in justifying his work, and
other criminals that are drooling at the thought of having
this tech.
But its too late for that.
Criminals are already using this blasphemous technology
covertly on innocent citizens.
You and/or the ones you care most about may be next to be
targeted.
Great News
9 months ago
Evil living speaker
Maria Perez
2 years ago
Nice job!
WWS TEXAS
3 years ago
Works a treat, i.e.: antifa.
RUHDD4HVN
2 years ago
2008-2014 Fauxbamas brain initiative scheme?
Brendan D. Murphy
9 months ago
Sick. I think you enjoyed talking about this horrific stuff
a bit TOO much, James…
wayne steven
3 days ago
His art, his friends, his, there technologies,, did not come
through the human mind thinking them up,, they were given to
them,, technologies, that were forbidden to be given to
man,, just like days of Enoch,, forbidden knowledge,
technology, things, given from evil beings, not of this
earth, not aliens, fallen ones,, in exchange for things from
the humans, dark heart humand that were willing to make the
deal,, all the missing children worldwide, in usa,, that are
never found, millions each year, well figure it out,,,
Kathryn Erskine
5 months ago
What are they trying to achieve. This is stupid and
pointless in context of evolution. He’s talking rubbish ams
has no awareness of consciousness which is above and beyond
the brain.
Cory Deckard
1 year ago
U.N.C.A.T
A Ahr
1 year ago
Jesus will end with this diabolic science.
UniversalSailor44
3 months ago
I listened to the remaining hour and wasn’t disappointed:
Another hour of confidently spoken nothingness.
Maks kneb
8 months ago
This man is a little girl
stlivermore
3 years ago
What an absolutely hideous presentation of a completely
hideous topic with absolutely no gray ethical areas humanly
possible. An abomination replete with the most evil of
overtones of human folly.
12
|