| NewsFollowUp.com |
Franklingate sex scandal |
sitemap | home | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Israel |
add Refusnik Watch to your site Sykes Picot Agreement, 1948 Arab-Israeli war, Wikipedia PDF file Israel, false flag, Flight 253, CIA, Mossad, RAW more |
money
laundering page |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Israel top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Miami
Herald
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DLC, page menu | |||
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Democratic Leadership Council & Israel top | |||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP COUNCIL and ISRAEL | CONSERVATIVE* |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
| Barrier top | ||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush |
|
|
|
| Israeli Peace Movement, Non Violence top | ||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush |
|
|
|
| Jewish National Fund top | ||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush |
|
|
|
| Lavon Affair, Operation Suzannah top | ||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush |
|
|
|
| Mossad, Russian-Israeli mafia top | ||||||||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush | ||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
| European anti-Semitism top | ||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush |
|
|
|
| Kosher Tax top | ||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush |
|
|
|
| History top | ||||||||||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush | ||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Israel's Defense Industry top | ||||||||||
| PROGRESSIVE | REFERENCE | Pro Bush | ||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
| The Shministim Letter 2008 Facebook | ||||||||||
|
We, high-school graduate teens, declare that we shall work
against the Israeli occupation and oppression policy in the occupied territories
and the territories of Israel. Therefore we will refuse to take part of these
actions, which are being done under our name as part of the IDF. Our refusal
comes first and foremost as a protest on the separation, control, oppression and
killing policy held by the state of Israel in the occupied territories, as we
understand that this oppression, killing and routing of hatred will never lead
us to peace, and they are all contradictory to the basic values a society that
pretends to be democratic should have.
All the members of this group believe in developing the value of social work. We are not refusing to serve the society we live in, but are protesting against the occupation and the ways of actions which the militaristic system holds as it is today- crushing civil rights, discriminating on a racial base and acting opposing international laws. We oppose the actions taken in the name of the “defense” of the Israeli society (Checkpoints, targeted killing, apartheid roads-available for Jews only, curfews etc.) that serve the occupation and exploitation policy , annex more conquered territories to the State of Israel and tramples the rights of the Palestinian population in an aggressive manner. These actions serve as a band-aid covering a bleeding wound, and as a limited and temporary solution that will accelerate and aggravate the conflict further. We expostulate the plundering and the theft of territories and source of income to the Palestinians in exchange to the expansion of the settlements, reasoning to defend Israeli territories. In addition, we oppose any transformation of Palestinian cities and villages to ghettos without minimal living conditions or income sources enclosed by the separation wall. We also protest the humiliating and disrespectful behavior of the military forces towards Palestinians in the West Bank; violence towards demonstrators, public humiliations, arrests, destruction of property regardless to any safety or defense needs, all of which violate global human rights and international law. The wall and blockades surround the Palestinian Territories and serve as a halter around the Palestinian’s neck. The soldiers who commit crimes under the patronage and protection of their commanders reflect the image of the Israeli society; a destructive and surprising society that is incapable of accepting its neighboring nation as a partner and not as an enemy. In order to hold an effective dialogue between the two societies, we, the well-established and stronger society, have the responsibility of establishing and strengthening the other. Only with a more socially and financially established partner could we work towards peace rather than one-sided retaliation acts. Rather than supporting those citizens who have hope for peace, the military cast sanctions and pushes more and more people towards acts of extreme violence and escalation. We hereby challenge every citizen who wonders if the military's policy in the occupied territories is conducive to the progression of the peace process, to discover by himself/ herself the truth and to lift the veil which distorts the reality of the situation; to verify statistical data; to look for the humane side in him/her and in the society which stands in front of him/her, to disprove the myths that were routed within us regarding the necessity of the IDF's in the Palestinian Occupied Territories, and to stand up against every action which he finds irrational and illegal. In a place were there are humans, there is someone to talk to. Therefore, we ask to create a dialogue that goes beyond the power struggle, the retaliation and one-sided attrition actions; to disprove the "No Partner" myth, which is leading to a lose-lose situation of an ongoing frustration, and to move to more humane methods. We cannot hurt in the name of defense or imprison in the name of freedom; therefore we cannot be moral and serve the occupation. Signed Members of the Shministim Letter 2008.
|
||||||||||
| Elections, Mar 2006 | ||
Winners and losers as the old guard is swept away By
Stephen Farrell and Ian MacKinnon TimesOnline
YASSIR ARAFAT: dead. Ariel Sharon: comatose. Binyamin
Netanyahu: routed. Shimon Peres: marginalised. Fatah and Likud: defeated.
Tuesday’s election completed the destruction of the people and parties
that have dominated Israeli politics for decades. They have been replaced
by a plethora of new personalities and parties that have emerged from
nowhere. Age swept away Messrs Arafat and Sharon. Israel’s
Labour party replaced the octogenarian Mr Peres as its leader with the
much younger Amir Peretz last November. The Islamic militant group Hamas
ended Fatah’s long supremacy in January. Now the Israeli electorate has
finished the process by handing victory to the four-month-old Kadima party
and its little-known leader, Ehud Olmert. Most prominent of Tuesday’s
casualties was the Likud party led by Mr Netanyahu, the former Prime
Minister. The party whose name means Unity and which has dominated Israeli
politics since 1977, came fifth, and was left a fragmented rump with only
11 seats. It was hit by the defection last year of Mr Sharon, Mr
Olmert and a host of senior ministers to the new, centrist Kadima
(Forward) party. It was also hit by the surge in support for the
right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel, Our Home) which won 12 seats and
pushed Likud into fifth place. Appealing principally to Russian
voters, Yisrael Beitenyu is led by Avigdor Lieberman, a Moldovan-born West
Bank settler whose uncompromising platform is branded as openly racist by
critics. He advocates transferring 500,000 of Israel’s minority
Arab population to the West Bank, by the simple expedient of redrawing the
West Bank to include several Arab Israeli towns in northern Israel.
Another 500,000 would be stripped of their right to vote if they failed to
pledge loyalty to Zionism. “I think the real reason for the
conflict is the friction between two nations, two religions,” Mr
Lieberman told The Times on the eve of the election. “I don’t believe
in co-existence. We can be neighbours, but we can’t co-exist.” Another
leader delighted at the outcome will be Mr Peretz, the new Moroccan-born
Labour leader who suffered months of barely concealed racist taunts about
his Sephardic origins, inexperience and working-class background. He
delivered an unexpectedly strong showing for his party, which won 20
seats, and is set to gain a prominent ministerial position. The
surprise emergence of the new pensioners’ party is a sign of how
domestic issues did in fact play a part in an election largely dominated
by discussion of PalestinianIsraeli security issues. GIL — Hebrew
for “Age” is headed by Rafi Eitan, a 79-year-old former Mossad chief
who ran a sophisticated spying operation against the US — supposedly
Israel’s closest ally — through the US Navy analyst Jonathan
Pollard, who was convicted of spying for Israel in the 1980s. Mr
Eitan, who capitalised on concern over poverty and stringent
market-oriented economic reforms during Mr Netanyahu’s term as Finance
Minister, is a natural ally for Mr Olmert, but insists that his party will
only join a coalition that will safeguard the rights of the elderly. The
party represents 750,000 Israelis of retirement age, but also attracted
many younger voters.
|
Pro-Israel
Lobby in US Under Attack and see UPI
(conservative
news, Sun Myung Moon)
"Professor John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, author
of "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" and Professor
Stephen Walt of Harvard's Kenney School, and author of "Taming
American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy," are leading
figures American in academic life. and Harvard
, "The
Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy". |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The article, which is already stirring furious debate in US academic and intellectual circles, also explores the historical role of the Lobby. WASHINGTON - (UPI) - Two of America's top scholars have published a searing attack on the role and power of Washington's pro-Israel lobby in a British journal, warning that its "decisive" role in fomenting the Iraq war is now being repeated with the threat of action against Iran. And they say that the Lobby is so strong that they doubt their article would be accepted in any U.S.-based publication. Professor John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, author of "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" and Professor Stephen Walt of Harvard's Kenney School, and author of "Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy," are leading figures American in academic life. They claim that the Israel lobby has distorted American policy and operates against American interests, that it has organized the funneling of more than $140 billion dollars to Israel and "has a stranglehold" on the U.S. Congress, and its ability to raise large campaign funds gives its vast influence over Republican and Democratic administrations, while its role in Washington think tanks on the Middle East dominates the policy debate. And they say that the Lobby works ruthlessly to suppress questioning of its role, to blacken its critics and to crush serious debate about the wisdom of supporting Israel in U.S. public life. "Silencing skeptics by organizing blacklists and boycotts -- or by suggesting that critics are anti-Semites -- violates the principle of open debate on which democracy depends," Walt and Mearsheimer write. "The inability of Congress to conduct a genuine debate on these important issues paralyses the entire process of democratic deliberation. Israel's backers should be free to make their case and to challenge those who disagree with them, but efforts to stifle debate by intimidation must be roundly condemned," they add, in the 12,800-word article published in the latest issue of The London Review of Books. The article focuses strongly on the role of the "neo-conservatives" within the Bush administration in driving the decision to launch the war on Iraq. "The main driving force behind the war was a small band of neo-conservatives, many with ties to the Likud," Mearsheimer and Walt argue." Given the neo-conservatives' devotion to Israel, their obsession with Iraq, and their influence in the Bush administration, it isn't surprising that many Americans suspected that the war was designed to further Israeli interests." "The neo-conservatives had been determined to topple Saddam even before Bush became president. They caused a stir early in 1998 by publishing two open letters to Clinton, calling for Saddam's removal from power. The signatories, many of whom had close ties to pro-Israel groups like JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) or WINEP (Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy), and who included Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Bernard Lewis, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, had little trouble persuading the Clinton administration to adopt the general goal of ousting Saddam. But they were unable to sell a war to achieve that objective. They were no more able to generate enthusiasm for invading Iraq in the early months of the Bush administration. They needed help to achieve their aim. That help arrived with 9/11. Specifically, the events of that day led Bush and Cheney to reverse course and become strong proponents of a preventive war," Walt and Mearsheimer write. The article, which is already stirring furious debate in U.S. academic and intellectual circles, also explores the historical role of the Lobby. "For the past several decades, and especially since the Six-Day War in 1967, the centerpiece of US Middle Eastern policy has been its relationship with Israel," the article says. "The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort to spread 'democracy' throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized not only U.S. security but that of much of the rest of the world. This situation has no equal in American political history. Why has the U.S. been willing to set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?" Professors Walt and Mearsheimer add. "The thrust of U.S. policy in the region derives almost entirely from domestic politics, and especially the activities of the 'Israel Lobby'. Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. interests and those of the other country - in this case, Israel -- are essentially identical," they add. They argue that far from being a strategic asset to the United States, Israel "is becoming a strategic burden" and "does not behave like a loyal ally." They also suggest that Israel is also now "a liability in the war on terror and the broader effort to deal with rogue states. "Saying that Israel and the U.S. are united by a shared terrorist threat has the causal relationship backwards: the US has a terrorism problem in good part because it is so closely allied with Israel, not the other way around," they add. "Support for Israel is not the only source of anti-American terrorism, but it is an important one, and it makes winning the war on terror more difficult. There is no question that many al-Qaeda leaders, including Osama bin Laden, are motivated by Israel's presence in Jerusalem and the plight of the Palestinians. Unconditional support for Israel makes it easier for extremists to rally popular support and to attract recruits." They question the argument that Israel deserves support as the only democracy in the Middle East, claiming that "some aspects of Israeli democracy are at odds with core American values. Unlike the US, where people are supposed to enjoy equal rights irrespective of race, religion or ethnicity, Israel was explicitly founded as a Jewish state and citizenship is based on the principle of blood kinship. Given this, it is not surprising that its 1.3 million Arabs are treated as second-class citizens." The most powerful force in the Lobby is AIPAC, the American-Israel Public affairs Committee, which Walt and Mearsheimer call "a de facto agent for a foreign government," and which they say has now forged an important alliance with evangelical Christian groups. The bulk of the article is a detailed analysis of the way they claim the Lobby managed to change the Bush administration's policy from "halting Israel's expansionist policies in the Occupied Territories and advocating the creation of a Palestinian state" and divert it to the war on Iraq instead. They write "Pressure from Israel and the Lobby was not the only factor behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical." "Thanks to the lobby, the United States has become the de facto enabler of Israeli expansion in the Occupied Territories, making it complicit in the crimes perpetrated against the Palestinians," and conclude that "Israel itself would probably be better off if the Lobby were less powerful and U.S. policy more even-handed." © Copyright 2006 United Press International
|
| SEC Foreign Companies Registered and Reporting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission December 31, 2003 Geographic Listing by Country of Incorporation. | |
ACS-Tech 80 Ltd. Israel SM CAP Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd. Israel NMS Alvarion Ltd. Israel NMS American Israeli Paper Mills Ltd. Israel AMEX Arel Communications & Software Ltd. Israel NMS Attunity Ltd. Israel NMS Audiocodes Ltd. Israel NMS Baran Group Ltd. Israel NMS Blue Square - Israel Ltd. Israel NYSE BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. Israel NMS BOS Better Online Solutions Ltd. Israel SM CAP BVR Systems Ltd. Israel OTC BVR Technologies Ltd. Israel OTC Camtek Ltd. Israel NMS Carmel Container Systems Ltd. Israel AMEX Ceragon Networks Ltd. Israel NMS Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Israel Cimatron Ltd. Israel NMS Commtouch Software Ltd. Israel NMS Compugen Ltd. Israel NMS Crow Technologies 1977 Ltd. Israel OTC Delta Galil Industries Ltd. Israel NMS ECI Telecommunications Ltd. Israel NMS Ectel Ltd. Israel NMS Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. Israel NMS Elbit Systems Ltd. Israel NMS Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. Israel OTC Electrochemical Industries 1952 Ltd. Israel Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. Israel NMS Elscint Ltd. Israel NYSE Eltek Ltd. Israel NMS Engel General Developers Ltd. Israel OTC e-Sim Ltd. Israel OTC Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. Israel NMS Fundtech Ltd. Israel NMS G. Willi-Food International Ltd. Israel Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. Israel NMS Given Imaging Ltd. Israel NMS Healthcare Technologies Ltd. Israel SM CAP I.I.S. Intelligent Information Systems Ltd. Industrial Development Bank of Israel Ltd. Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. Israel NMS Israel Bank of Agriculture Ltd. Israel OTC |
Jacada Ltd. Israel NMS Koor Industries Ltd. Israel NYSE Lanoptics Ltd. Israel NMS Magal Security Systems Ltd. Israel NMS Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. Israel NMS Marnetics Broadband Technologies Ltd. Israel OTC Matav Cable Systems Media Ltd. Israel NMS Mentergy Ltd. Israel OTC Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. Israel NMS Metalink Ltd. Israel NMS Mind C.T.I. Ltd. Israel NMS M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd. Israel NMS Nexus Telocation Systems Ltd. Israel OTC Nice Systems Ltd. Israel NMS Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. Israel NMS Nur Macroprinters Ltd. Israel NMS On-Track Innovations Ltd. Israel SM CAP Optibase Ltd. Israel NMS Orbotech Ltd. Israel NMS Orckit Communications Ltd. Israel NMS Oz Investments Co. Ltd. Israel OTC Partner Communications Co. Ltd. Israel NMS Rada Electronic Industries Ltd. Israel NMS Radcom Ltd. Israel NMS Radware Ltd. Israel NMS Retalix Ltd. Israel NMS RIT Technologies Ltd. Israel NMS RoboGroup T.E.K. Ltd. Israel SM CAP Robomatix Technologies Ltd. Israel OTC Scitex Corp. Ltd. Israel NMS Silicom Ltd. Israel SM CAP Super-Sol Ltd. Israel OTC Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Israel NMS TAT Technologies Ltd. Israel NMS Tecnomatix Technologies Ltd. Israel NMS Tefron Ltd. Israel NYSE Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Israel NMS Tioga Technologies Ltd. Israel OTC Top Image Systems Ltd. Israel SM CAP Tower Semiconductor Ltd. Israel NMS TTI Team Telecom International Ltd. Israel NMS Viryanet Ltd. Israel NMS Vocaltec Communications Ltd. Israel NMS |
|
| Israel False Flag Operations: |
|
If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of
shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit you support Bush,
you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece
of shit
you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit
you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit
you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit
you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit
you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit
you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit If you support Bush, you're a fucking piece of shit